The Science Behind Nimbus Earth Agriculture: Remote Sensing & Biophysics

Methodology & Citations Sensor Calibration

Scientific Methodology Summary

The platform combines Sentinel satellite constellations and biophysical algorithms to track crop water use and soil moisture. It reads crop condition from Sentinel-2 multispectral imagery, keeps a daily soil water balance for every field from local rain and evaporation (validated against the UK's COSMOS-UK ground stations), calculates reference crop water loss using the FAO-56 Penman-Monteith method, and maps each field's stable high- and low-performing zones from multi-year imagery. This provides scientifically validated, peer-reviewed precision data to optimize farm irrigation and pasture yields.

1. Sentinel-2 Radiometric Calibration (DQR nr. 119)

To guarantee reflectance accuracy across different satellite platforms, the platform processes Sentinel-2 multispectral bands according to the latest European Space Agency (ESA) processing guidelines. For the Sentinel-2C satellite platform, a radiometric offset of -50 Digital Numbers (DN) is applied to all reflective bands (B02 to B12) to compensate for baseline sensor differences, converting raw sensor values to surface reflectance (\(\rho\)):

ρ = max(0.0, (DN_raw - 50) / 10000.0)

This calibration prevents spectral biases, ensuring indices like NDVI, SAVI, and NDRE remain stable regardless of which satellite passes over your field.

2. Daily Soil Water Balance for Soil Moisture

Each field's topsoil is modelled as a store holding S = 100 mm of water. Each day, rain P and logged irrigation I fill it; evaporation draws it down at the FAO-56 reference rate ET0 while the store is above 70% full, tapering linearly below that; water above full drains away:

wt = clamp( wt−1 + (P + I − ET0 · min(1, wt−1 / 0.7)) / S , 0, 1 )

The balance runs over the trailing 92 days of Open-Meteo rain and ET0 (start-up error under 2 points), and fullness w maps to volumetric soil moisture over a soil-texture range (loam/unknown: 14–41%). Validated against 18 COSMOS-UK farmland stations over two years: r = 0.90, RMSE ≈ 5.5% volumetric moisture content, inside the 6% target; a single probe reading calibrates a field's offset. The Sentinel-1 Water Cloud Model it replaced scored r = 0.43 with a −27-point bias, and radar change detection r = 0.69. Full method: How the App Measures Soil Moisture.

3. Reference Crop Evapotranspiration (FAO-56 Penman-Monteith)

Reference evapotranspiration (\(ET_0\), mm/day) measures the atmospheric water demand from a standardized reference grass crop. The platform implements the internationally recognized **FAO-56 Penman-Monteith** equation:

\[ET_0 = \frac{0.408 \Delta (R_n - G) + \gamma \frac{900}{T + 273} u_2 (e_s - e_a)}{\Delta + \gamma (1 + 0.34 u_2)}\]

Where daily weather parameters are integrated from land-anchored meteorological grids:

4. Dynamic Crop Water Balance

To schedule irrigation, the platform runs a daily forward-looking root-zone deficit model. The water height that a field can hold before stress occurs—Readily Available Water (RAW, mm)—is calculated from the crop's active root depth (\(z_r\)), depletion fraction (\(p\)), and soil texture field capacity (FC) and wilting point (WP):

TAW = (FC - WP) · z_r · 1000
RAW = p · TAW

Crop water consumption (\(ET_c\)) is computed by multiplying reference evapotranspiration by stage-specific crop coefficients (\(K_c\)):

ETc = Kc · ETo

Daily depletion balances accumulate based on crop transpiration minus effective rainfall (\(P_{\text{eff}}\)), advising farmers precisely how many days remain before the soil moisture dips below the crop's stress threshold.

5. Field Zones (Yield-Stability Management Zoning)

Field zones show where a field consistently performs better or worse than itself. The platform follows the yield-stability approach used for multi-year yield maps, applied to Sentinel-2 greenness. Up to 15 clear, green-season passes are selected from the last three years (at least 90% of the field cloud-free and a field median NDVI of at least 0.3, or 0.25 in arid zones), spread evenly across the period. On each pass \(t\), every 10 m pixel \(i\) is expressed relative to that day's field median, so the crop's seasonal rise and fall cancels out:

r(i,t) = NDVI(i,t) / median_field( NDVI(t) )

Each pixel's zone is set by the median of its ratios across passes, \(\tilde{r}_i\), which ignores one-off outliers such as a cloud edge the mask missed. Its consistency is measured with the robust spread \(s_i = 1.4826 \cdot \text{MAD}_t\, r(i,t)\):

A 5 × 5 majority filter removes isolated pixels so zones are large enough to manage. Each zone is reported with its share of the field and its typical gap, \(\text{mean}(\tilde{r}) - 1\) (e.g. “28% less green”). Repeatability is a built-in check: the passes are split into two independent halves, each half is classified separately, and the share of pixels that land in the same zone is reported. Fewer than six qualifying passes returns “not enough clear history” rather than a map. Zones describe greenness (NDVI), a strong guide to crop performance but not a direct yield measurement; elevation and slope are reported alongside from the Copernicus DEM (GLO-30, or GLO-90 where unavailable).

6. Selected Scientific References

The algorithms and methods running inside the platform are based on the following published academic research:

Application Primary Reference Citation
Soil Moisture Validation Evans, J. G., et al. (2016). Soil water content in southern England derived from a cosmic-ray soil moisture observing system – COSMOS-UK. Hydrological Processes, 30(26), 4987-4999. Data: COSMOS-UK, UK Centre for Ecology & Hydrology.
Evapotranspiration Allen, R. G., Pereira, L. S., Raes, D., & Smith, M. (1998). Crop evapotranspiration-Guidelines for computing crop water requirements. FAO Irrigation and Drainage Paper 56, FAO, Rome.
Field Zones Blackmore, S. (2000). The interpretation of trends from multiple yield maps. Computers and Electronics in Agriculture, 26(1), 37-51.
Pasture Wilting Nelson, D. W., & Pitt, R. E. (1986). A model of the field drying of grass and alfalfa. Journal of Agricultural Engineering Research, 34(3), 203-215.